The Violence Worker!

What Happened To Dissent?

Democrats and others on the left hated George W. Bush.  They hated him (and still do) with all the passion and bile they can muster.  Old news, I know. 

Now that a liberal Democrat is President, hatred is being redefined as hoping Obama fails.

There are right-wing ideologs (sic) who are praying for our president’s failure. You’ve only to turn on Fox”News” to hear their venom. President Obama is going to be held to a microscope, criticized and misconstrued. He hadn’t made it to the first inaugural ball before some began to decry his oath-taking which was botched by Justice Roberts. There are those who would rather wish our country ill than to see a Democratic Black Man lead us out of the morass left by the last administration. Undoubtedly some of these people wish President Obama more ill than just failure. Evil does not just dwell in the mountains of Pakistan and Afghanistan.

In a comment I left (I sometimes write for this blog)  I said this:

And how hard did you pray that Mr. Bush would succeed? Actually, we pray for Obama in my house as much as we prayed for Bush and will continue to do so for whoever may sit in the Oval Office.

What I hope Mr. Obama fails at is turning us into socialist state - or at least more than what we are.

Are the left-wing ideologues who venomously hated Mr. Bush any better than those who might feel similar to Mr. Obama?

Personally, I certainly don't wish President Obama any personal ill will. I certainly don't hate him. But I disagree with a lot of what President Obama hopes to accomplish. I think it's wrong for the country.

Is that a wish for failure? In a way, but no more than I hoped that some of Mr. Bush's policies would fail because I thought they were ill conceived.

In a two party system, we will have different ideas as to how the country should be run. Dissent IS patriotic, isn't it?

I would really like to know how many Democrats hoped Mr. Bush would succeed?  And now that their apparent savior is in office, Mr. Obama is now sacrosanct.  To question Obama or to think that his agenda is somehow above the harsh light of criticism now seems to be off limits.  When Bush waas President, we were told that "dissent is patriotic".  Now that Obama is President, it's a vehicle for hatred. 

No one (or anyone I would associate with) wants to see our new President harmed in any way.  What I and the tens of millions of people who did not vote for Obama hope is that he isn't successful at turning us into some form of socialist state where dissent squashed and opportunity is limited.

If questioning Obama and his agenda is somehow equated with hatred, is the quashing of dissent not lurking far behind?

VW

The Dictator That Wasn't

Do you remember back not too long ago, a number of people on the left were saying that President Bush would not leave office by choice.  They believed that he was going to pull some kind of phony attack, declare a state of emergency, halt the election and become the dictator he always wanted to be.  Other scenarios had the omnipotent Karl Rove somehow rigging the 2008 election and to have a Bush surrogate (a la Putin/Medvedev) take office.

An example would be Harvey Wasserman and Bob Fitrakis, writing at CommonDreams.org.  Common dreams isn't as big as the PuffHo, but they are a popular destination for the whine wine and canapé liberalés. 

On July 31st, 2007, Mssrs. Wasserman and  Fitrakis wrote:

It is time to think about the "unthinkable."

The Bush Administration has both the inclination and the power to cancel the 2008 election.

The GOP strategy for another electoral theft in 2008 has taken clear shape, though we must assume there is much more we don't know.

But we must also assume that if it appears to Team Bush/Cheney/Rove that the GOP will lose the 2008 election anyway (as it lost in Ohio 2006) we cannot ignore the possibility that they would simply cancel the election. Those who think this crew will quietly walk away from power are simply not paying attention.

Wasserman and Fitrakis, in their diseased little brains, then go on to describe some past Presidents and their abuses.  Surprisingly, they mention FDR forcing Japanese Americans into internment camps.  They also assert that Halliburton is (was) in the process of building concentration camps for recalcitrant liberals.

It's too bad that you can't go to these dweebs and point out to them that Bush just handed the keys to the White House to the new President Obama.  There were no shenanigans, no 9/11-esque attacks, and no camps.  Power transferred as it has 43 other times, peacefuly and lawfully. 

I'm sure that they would have some harebrained excuse, but it would at least be amusing to hear it.

VW

Time Blames Bush For Gaza

Scott McLeod is Time's Middle East go-to guy.  He's also a Bush hating moonbat, but then you probably knew that since he works for Time.  He wrote a piece explaining why the current battle in Gaza is W's fault.  Essentially, he tries to blame Bush for not correcting a centuries old fight.  Herewith is the heart of Mr. McLeod's rant.

The U.S. has the indispensable role to play in ending the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But after spending most of its two terms walking away from negotiations and aimlessly supporting unilateral moves by Israeli hard-liners, the huge death tolls and continuing bloodshed are not the only results of the mismanagement of America's role. Israeli and Palestinian politics have become more severely fragmented, making it more difficult to find leaders who can make necessary and courageous decisions and make them stick for peace. The latest unspeakable round of killing is as much about the factional jockeying for power as it is about anything else--it's surely not about liberating Palestine or winning the war on terrorism, is it?

If there's anything good to come out of it, perhaps it's that the fighting on the eve of Barack Obama's inauguration as the next American president will further concentrate his mind on the need to get serious about U.S. diplomacy in the Middle East. A year ago, Bush convened the Annapolis peace conference in a clumsy, last-ditch effort to correct the mistake he made by abandoning U.S. mediation for nearly seven years. He optimistically predicted the parties would reach some kind of an agreement before he left office in January 2009. What happened instead? His legacy in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the scene of dead and wounded on the streets of Gaza.

Like every President before him, Bush tried to bring them to the peace table and like every President before him, he failed to bring about any kind of real peace.  He doesn't mention the fact that Clinton was not exactly successful in his eight years.  Perhaps President Bush understands what people like McLeod either can't or won't understand:  Hamas and their ilk do not want peace.

Sadly, Mr. McLeod doesn't tell us what Mr. Bush needed to say or do.  What magical thing could Bush say to the Palestinians and the Israelis that would bring about lasting peace in the region?  Hamas is a terrorist organization, dedicated in their quest to destroy the Israeli state and annihilate the Jews.  What do you say to them to make them accept Israel's right to exist?  He just says Bush didn't do the job.   If it is just sitting down at the table and talking, what should Bush (or any President for that matter) propose that would leave both sides feeling they came away from the bargaining table with a bargain?

I guarantee you that Barack Obama will not be able to hammer out any kind of lasting peace accord either. Hamas, and their Islamist allies are intractable in their determination to destroy Israel and Mr. Obama will not be able to negotiate that kind of hatred away.

VW

Tilting At Impeachment

It's time again for the Impeachment Follies starring Dennis "Don Quixote" Kucinich. 

Kucinich was offering his second impeachment resolution, which unlike last month's with its more than 30 articles, has just a single article of impeachment. Kucinich said he boiled it down to focus on the main issues he has with the president's decision to go to war in Iraq.

You have to wonder if this guy really wants to push impeachment or just grab a headline every so often.  Unfortunately, he's just bat sh*t insane enough to believe his own crap so he probably is pushing it for real and it appears that Nancy Pelosi is tossing him some peanuts to keep him mollified.

I've said this time and again, if the Democrats had actual legal grounds to impeach, they would have done so from jump street in 2006.  With six months left before the President leaves office, there isn't enough time for it to happen.  In a couple of weeks, they will break for the August recess.  They will come back in September for a couple of weeks and then break for elections and campaigning.  They will reconvene again in November for a few weeks, break for Thanksgiving week and then split again in December for the holidays.  By the time they are done, a new Congress will have been elected, Bush will be gone and a new President inaugurated.

It's time to tell Kookcinich to quit wasting time and money on this Quixotic quest.

VW

Post Bush

There's kind of a meme going around a few blogs today about what the left is going to do when they no longer have George W. Bush to kick around anymore.  It's a mildly interesting topic, so I thought I'd put in my two cents since it's too hot to go out and mow the lawn.

At Wizbang, Cassy Fiano says this:

There are so many lefties who are absolutely consumed with hatred of W. Once he's out of office and there's no one left to hate, what are they going to do with themselves? There'll be no more need for protesting the "Bush regime". There'll be no more reason to carry on with BDS. It'll be over. And I can't help but think that these lefties who hate W will be massively disappointed that their conspiracy theories weren't true. It seems to me like these people were enjoying their misery these past eight years thoroughly. It probably makes them feel so important to carry on with all of these protests, so sophisticated to deny America and align themselves with terrorists and their appeasers. They get attention for their stunts. And with Bush out of office, all of that will go away.

I can only imagine the emptiness these people will feel, especially if Obama gets the Presidency... because with McCain they can continue on with their merry charade, bleating feebly about how this is really Bush's third term, and Karl Rove is behind the whole thing anyways, and by the way, have they told you about Halliburton conspiring with the Jews to take out Palestine?

So, I'd imagine that they'd be terribly disappointed if their guy wins, because then, their entire existence will be erased. They'll have their Marxist President, and everything they've been working towards will likely happen.

The question is, what then? After the "Bush regime" has been driven out, what are these idiots going to do? My guess is, they'll probably do one of two things. They'll either keep protesting about nothing the way they have been for the past eight years, claiming that McCain's presidency is really just a shadow presidency and that Bush is still in charge. OR, they'll sit around, soaking in their nostalgia, wishing for the good 'ole days when they had a reason to feel important.

I'm going to disagree with Ms. Fiano.  She thinks that if Obama wins, it will take the wind out of their sails and I just don't believe that. Hate doesn't die that easily and the hatred for Bush and his administration is a huge, palpable, seething, festering beast that will not go gently into death or even slumber.  Hatred must feed to live and the left will have to find food for their hate beast or risk letting it die in some kind of nostalgic, marijuana induced haze.  Hate is their comforter; their warm blanket they wrap in during a cold winter night in front of a crackling fire.  As much as the left claims they are about peace, they need a bogeyman.  They need hatred and bad things to happen to perpetuate their existence. They will even go so far as to fake an attack by bigots to try and stir up an outcry that hatred and bigotry exists and we need them to expose it and eradicate it.  There are numerous instances where people have been caught fabricating a so-called hate crime to either draw attention to themselves or their cause.

If McCain loses to Obama, the left will not lose its well nourished hatred for Bush.  Indeed, the left will continue to hound the Congress and the Courts to arrest, try, jail, torture and execute any and all Bush administration officials.  They will turn their hate to any perceived enemy.  Indeed, the scope of their hate will not lessen, it will broaden.  They will demand that Conservative opinion be censored and censured.  They will be emboldened to increase totalitarian control over the commercial airwaves, cable wires and satellite links.  Dissent will all of a sudden cease to be patriotic. 

Admittedly, I paint a rather dismal scenario almost as if I'm encouraging people to hate from my perspective.  Certainly the battle for freedom and free speech will be an important one if Obama wins, but to think I hate them or even despise them is a bit of a stretch.  My fear is not one borne out some kind of hatred, but  from a definite concern.  The left openly advocates the limiting of free speech through such draconian methods as the "Fairness Doctrine".

I don't hate them, I fear them.

VW

Judge, Jury And Executioner

In September, the Massachusetts School of Law, a private law school, will convene a conference with the express purpose of charging President Bush and members of his administration with war crimes.

From their press release:

A conference to plan the prosecution of President Bush and other high administration officials for war crimes will be held September 13-14 at the Massachusetts School of Law at Andover .

"This is not intended to be a mere discussion of violations of law that have occurred," said convener Lawrence Velvel, dean and cofounder of the school. "It is, rather, intended to be a planning conference at which plans will be laid and necessary organizational structures set up, to pursue the guilty as long as necessary and, if need be, to the ends of the Earth."

"We must try to hold Bush administration leaders accountable in courts of justice," Velvel said. "And we must insist on appropriate punishments, including, if guilt is found, the hangings visited upon top German and Japanese war-criminals in the 1940s."

If you look at the second paragraph, this steaming pile has already determined their guilt  so finding guilt is a forgone conclusion.

This is a kangaroo kourt type of action.  No one appointed these people, no one elected them, no one commissioned them to do this.  They intend to be the default prosecutors.

For Bush, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and John Yoo to spend years in jail or go to the gallows for their crimes would be a powerful lesson to future American leaders," Velvel said.

The conference will take up such issues as the nature of domestic and international crimes committed; which high-level Bush officials, including Federal judges and Members of Congress, are chargeable with war crimes; which foreign and domestic tribunals can be used to prosecute them; and the setting up of an umbrella coordinating committee with representatives of legal groups concerned about the war crimes such as the Center for Constitutional Rights, ACLU,  among others.

I doubt they will be real successful.  Foreign jurisdictions have been really hesitant in the past to involve themselves and they will not find a domestic jurisdiction even remotely interested in touching this with a pole long enough to poke at the moon.  Either they are the most stupid bunch of lawyers that ever walked the earth or it's nothing more than a stunt and I suspect the latter (I could be wrong here, they could be really, really stupid.).  There is already one group wanting you, a private citizen, to attempt a citizen's arrest on some of these folks. 

The problem with these nutbags are that they have set themselves up as judge and jury and are salivating to become the executioners.  My guess is that they are ordinarily opposed to the death penalty and one of their arguments would be that it is not any kind of a deterrent.  I guess it must only serve as a deterrent for war criminals so is allowed in this case.

Velvel said past practice has been to allow U.S. officials responsible for war crimes in Viet Nam and elsewhere to enjoy immunity from prosecution upon leaving office. "President Johnson retired to his Texas ranch and his Defense Secretary Robert McNamara was named to head the World Bank; Richard Nixon retired to San Clemente and his Secretary of State Henry Kissinger was allowed to grow richer and richer," Velvel said.

Note that they are not interested in going after anyone from the other side and they didn't mention the atrocities of the North Vietnamese when he talked about Johnson and Nixon. 

Given the above, one wonders if they won't go after John McCain for hurting his captors' hands with his teeth.

Watch for the violence to take an upswing this summer.  These people are getting out of control.

VW

Hat Tip: Bainbridge

Gore Vidal - Bitter Old Fool

Gore Vidal is an unhinged old man.  Mr. Vidal is an author and essayist, but he also is an anti-American jerk who likes biting the hand that fed him all these years.

He was born to privilege.  According to Wikipedia, his father was a West Pointer and his mother was a wealthy socialite/Actress.  Mr. Gore attended the exclusive Sidwell Friends School in Washington DC.

He then attended St. Alban's whose current tuition costs make it just slightly more exclusive:

He graduated high school from Phillips Exeter Academy.  Tuition for boarding students will top out over 40 grand and for day students, over 30 grand these days.  (One wonders why he had to change schools three times)

Suffice to say that Mr. Vidal did not grow up in a log cabin with a dirt floor and does not live very modestly in his old age.  He sold a huge villa in the cost of Italy and returned to LA, not too long ago.

In an interview recently, Vidal displayed why he is a whack job:

It will take the United States a century to recover from the damage wreaked by President George. W Bush, US writer Gore Vidal said in an interview published on Saturday.

"The president behaved like a virtual criminal but we didn't have the courage to sack him for fear of violating the American constitution," Vidal told the El Mundo newspaper.

The author, a trenchant critic of the US-led invasion of Iraq, said it would take the United States "100 years to repair the damage" caused by Bush.

"We live in a dictatorship. We have a fascist government ...which controls the media," he said.

This deranged old bastard, for all is alleged intellectual powers, is nothing more than a liar.  Quite possibly, old age has finally come home to roost in the old reprobate's belfry.  For proof, all we have to do is go to this next statement:

Vidal also said presidential aspirant Barack Obama was "intelligent" adding that it would be a "novelty" to have an "intelligent" person in the White House.

Yeah, we have a dictatorship.  Someone tell this clueless old jerk that in dictatorships, opposition candidates aren't usually out actively campaigning for the dictator's job unless he has a wish to be a martyr and you can't convince me that Obama has his sights set on becoming one with the worms anytime soon.

And as to his theory that the press is controlled by the government?  The NYT, otherwise known as the White House Propaganda Organ, is featuring a Vidal interview today:

Are you saying your novels have been critically neglected? I don’t even read most reviews, unless there is a potential lawsuit on view. I’ve never had much attention paid by critics — nor has anybody else in the United States of America, as Mr. Obama likes to call it.

And what about Mr. McCain? Disaster. Who started this rumor that he was a war hero? Where does that come from, aside from himself? About his suffering in the prison war camp?

Everyone knows he was a prisoner of war in North Vietnam. That’s what he tells us.

Why would you doubt him? He’s a graduate of Annapolis. I know a lot of the Annapolis breed. Remember, I’m West Point, where I was born. My father went there.

So what does that have to do with the U.S. Naval Academy down in Annapolis? The service universities keep track of each other, that’s all. They have views about each other. And they are very aware of social class and eventually money, since they usually marry it.

So McCain made up the whole POW thing.  Why anyone even pays attention to this bitter old fool is beyond me.

I'll say one thing.  I'm grateful that the NYT was allowed by the Bush Administration to publish this interview.  How else would we know that this guy's brain is long dead and his body hasn't yet got the news.

VW

Arresting War Criminals

In my occupation I use hand tools.  I use wrenches, ratchets, sockets, pliers, screwdrivers and the like to perform my job.  When I select a wrench for use, I intend to use that wrench to perform a specific function.  Maybe I'll be adjusting something or perhaps I'll be loosening a bolt and sometimes, it's as close to a hammer as I can get and I use it to tap on something.  Today I tapped a little clip into place.  Don't laugh, every mechanic I know has done similar so they don't have to drop what they are doing to walk over and get the proper tool.  The point is that tools don't use me, I use tools. 

There are people though that are like tools.  Tool is a popular derisive term and has more to do with acting like a (insert your favorite euphemism for the male anatomy here) then as a manipulated object.  In this particular case though, when I use the word tool, either context is applicable, but the latter is more to the point..

I'm sure most of you read about some Braniac's (George Monbiot) attempt to try and arrest John Bolton as a war criminal.  This particular Einstein's attempt was thwarted by some beefy security people.  Of course anyone with half a brain knew that was going to happen as this genius telegraphed his impending action to the press.  That fact that he was stopped from apprehending Ambassador Bolton was exactly what he hoped would happen.  He got some publicity and he wasn't arrested for a myriad of criminal charges that could have landed himself in the hoosegow instead of Mr. Bolton.

Now a moonbat group wants YOU to take up where George Monbiot left off.  In other words, they want you to be their tool.

David Swanson, one of the fornders of After Downing Street.org has put together a few pages on how to make a citizen's arrest.  Of course one of his instructions is to keep your project a secret.  He gives you the cities where their list of war criminals live and urges his supporters to form arrest teams.  He suggests that a team member be a lawyer. 

He gives a link to Wikipedia that is sort of a caveat in that it tells you that unless you meet some very specific criteria, you will most likely be charged with a couple of felonies yourself:

A person who makes a citizen's arrest could risk exposing himself to possible lawsuits or criminal charges (such as charges of impersonating police, false imprisonment, kidnapping, or wrongful arrest) if the wrong person is apprehended or a suspect's civil rights are violated."

But Mr. Swanson then says:

In the case of the war criminals we propose detaining, they are public figures and we have all witnessed their felonies, as detailed above.

So go ahead kiddies, make your arrests.  Never mind that they will not help you when you are arrested for one or more of the charges listed above.  You get arrested and they get their cause in the papers - TOOL!  You've been used!

VW

From :  Moonbattery and the permalink to his post

Is The Party Over?

Interestingly, as I set out to write this, Newsbusters posted a poll asking who is to blame for the collapse of the Republican Party.  There were several possible responses listed here:

• George W. Bush's "compassionate conservatism"
• Expanding Medicare with prescription drugs for seniors
• Overspending while in control of Congress and White House
• Failure to reform Social Security
• Not capturing bin Laden
• Length of the war in Iraq
• Failure to stop illegal immigration
• The resignation of Tom DeLay
• Horrible leadership by Hastert and Frist
• Bush Derangement Syndrome in the media
• Other (please comment)

A case could be made for every one of these.  Certainly they have all contributed to the collapse.  As a conservative, I usually try to take the position of self-responsibility and I won't dispute the fact that we placed a loaded gun to our own head.  The first nine reasons listed are proof that we weren't all that interested in breathing in the first place.  Let's be honest.  When Republicans start acting like Democrats: engaging in debauchery, spending taxes like there is no tomorrow and engaging in various forms of corruption, what choice are we offering people?

As much as we need to take responsibility for our own classless act, we have help.  This is an assisted suicide and our own Doctor Kevorkian is the mainstream media.

Day after day in the papers and minute by minute on the networks, the press pounds out the message that the Republicans are racist, homophobic, corrupt, warmongering, child and elderly hating, sexist, environment raping oil company lovers.  When ninety percent of the press are left of center and usually vote for Democrats, we have very little voice.  When all that the public hears is vitriol against one side, the propaganda will eventually work.  People want to be nice and when you keep telling people how hateful Republicans are, they start getting the message.  Truth loses.

Sure, there's conservative talk radio, but frankly, there are relatively few voices and most people don't listen to it.  Limbaugh and Hannity have their audience, but in the scheme of things, it just isn't as effective as we think.  It's like blogging.  There are millions of bloggers, and a lot of conservative bloggers are out there.  By and large, I got the feeling that most of us were pushing Fred Thompson, but he didn't last very long at all.  Our least favorite candidate (with the exception of MoRon Paul) is the presumptive nominee.  As much as we like to think otherwise, talk radio and blogging are no match for the mainstream media. 

We also talk of the demise of the MSM like it's a done deal and frankly, it ain't!  The NYT and the WaPo may be losing subscribers, but their influence is still out there.  Look at the out and out lie promulgated by the WaPo this last week concerning McCain and Hamas.  Every major MSM outlet ran with it and after it was corrected by bloggers and the WaPo was notified, no retraction or attempt to rectify the wrong has been made.  It lends credence to the old Mark Twain truism: A lie gets half way around the world before the truth gets its pants on.

Ann Coulter is some how the devil in long legs, but Keith Olbermann is a moderate reincarnation of Edward Murrow.  Rush Limbaugh is a hate-filled bigot, but Randi Rhodes is a compassionate talker.  Fox News is run by the RNC, but CNN, MSNBC ABC and CBS are somehow nonpartisan - except when they ask Obama tough questions.

Movies are constantly portraying conservatives, military people, and businessmen as evil and contemptible figures bent on subjugating or destroying innocents.  Add to this the left's stranglehold on public education and higher education, is it any wonder we are dying? 

We are dying because we seem to not have the will to fight it.  We've allowed everyone to define us and we take it lying down.  The DNC and the Democrats can run some of the nastiest ads against us, yet when President Bush tells the truth about appeasement, the press and the Democrats cast us as liars and then lie to prove their point.

We aren't dead yet and death is not inevitable if we don't want it to be.  We need to stop trying to play nice.  I don't advocate breaking laws and I certainly don't want my party to do that, but when it comes to politics, we need to fight back just as hard and just as viciously.  Being nice is not going to win us any friends in the press.  They perceive that as weakness on our part and consider it to be a victory for them.  Take off the gloves for heaven's sake!  Hit them where they are vulnerable. 

Take this most recent incident concerning appeasement.  The Democrats really didn't deny it, they accused us of playing dirty.  They accused us of being mean.  They even had to make stuff up to show that McCain was for appeasement.

When they level a spurious charge, fight back.  Go for the underbelly.  The concept of compassionate conservatism was a lousy idea.   We need to be as compassionate to the Democrats as they are to us, which is to say - not compassionate at all.

We have a disadvantage.  The press is against us and it is difficult to get our message out, but we need to find new ways to do it.  We need to network better and we need to quit being ashamed of our conservatism.  We need to stop being intimidated by the shrieking left-wing extremists.  We need to start labeling these people as extremists because they are extreme. 

We need to stop thinking that if we use a little harsher rhetoric, they won't love us.   Forget about it because they won't love you anyway.   Who cares?  We need to go after the undecided and we need to show them in the most graphic way how socialism will negatively impact their life.  We need get down and dirty and play the game our way.

In the past few days, there's been some discussion amongst ourselves concerning this topic and as much as I'd like to think my two cents here will make a penny's worth of difference, I'd be under my own delusion.  That said, I hope someone will see this and start thinking on their own.  I hope someone will talk to someone who will talk to someone who might be in a position to actually do something. 

Call it a dream, not a delusion.

VW

Comments and Email - Oh My!

Bobf posted the YouTube video with Bob Hope and a great old movie line about Zombies and Democrats.  Now mix that with a guy out of Southern California  who uses various aliases and finds new IPs to post from who, to put it mildly, suffers from full blown Bush Derangement Syndrome.  Then let said Dweeb post your url several times in the Huffington Post comments to encourage people to harass you, and well it gets kind of crazy.  Never mind that this guy only has the intellectual capacity of your average 11-year-old.  He thinks he's Boffo the Conservative Slayer.  (I wrote to the Huff Post asking that they moderate this guy.  I won't hold my breath.)

I deleted the Dweeb's comments, but here is a sample from my comment email notifications of some of his more obnoxious (and racist) comments.  Caution, his use of sexual reference is about what you'd imagine for pre-teen.

Comment:
--------
you suck long time 

Notice how he assumes that all Asians speak that way.  Racist?  Maybe, but let me share with you this nugget:

Also, is that black child your slave, or do you, like Larry 'nasty,
naughty boy' Craig, tap dance in a wide stance?

He is, of course, referring to this picture of my granddaughter and me on the top left of the blog:

Please note, that he is also apparently homophobic.

Then, I get this email from some guy Daveherbs@comcast.net:

Dave thinks I'm a hater, apparently.  I replied to all (Those unknowns are actually real email addys that he not so cleverly tried to mask) with this:

No response from Dave yet.

Then this AM, I received this comment on this entry:

Comment:
--------
http://www.light-to-dark.com/t_equals.html


Yes, you are a violence worker.

I guess being anti-commie, anti-Castro and anti-Che means I'm violent.  Another intellectual giant!

I'm sure the the fun and games will be a large part of the weekend.  Stay tuna'd!

(Know that if you act stupid, I reserve the right to delete, modify or make public anything sent or posted here or to me)

VW