Climate change was never about controlling the climate. It's all about controlling people. The scientists used it to get grants and funding and the politicians saw an opportunity to get and maintain power. They fed off of each other, becoming fat and lazy, assured that the public was becoming mollified and it almost worked. The wheels started to fall off the climate change cart with the release of the East Anglia e-mails. There were other clues, like the dire warning that the polar ice caps would disappear last summer or this summer. They didn't and they won't and those scientists (who've tried to insist the science was settled) who tried to prove it were forced off the ice because it was colder than they anticipated.
Now we find out that the Himalayan Glaciers are here to stay as well.
Guess the science isn't so settled after all.
I don't disbelieve in climate change. Climates do change. They've been changing since there was such a thing as a climate. The difference is, I don't think it's anthropogenic. Over the eons, we see the evidence of global warming and cooling that happened long before man ever appeared on the scene. Ice ages followed by warming periods ebbed and flowed, carving our land and forming our waterways. A great example of warming and cooling is the Dry Falls near Grand Coulée in Washington State. (I'know it's a Wikipedia link, but I believe it to be accurate)
The politicians see this as an opportunity to move us left. Cap and trade and other schemes are all designed to limit growth and control us. It's about taking individual freedom and liberty away from us and replacing it with some kind of socialist model.
They might have made it, but someone at East Anglia spilled the beans.
VW







