North American Community Becoming Reality

This was written by Debbie at Right Truth and originally posted there.

VW

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The North American Community is not considered a formal union of the three countries, Mexico, Canada and the United States, as the North American Union is. However, there was a February 16 conference devoted to the development of a North American legal system, according to Cliff Kincaid of Accuracy in Media. He says, "The holding of the conference was itself evidence that a comprehensive process is underway to merge the economies, and perhaps the social and political systems, of the three countries."

[Robert] Pastor said that he favors a "North American Community," not a formal union of the three countries, and several speakers at the conference ridiculed the idea of protecting America's borders and suggested that American citizenship was an outmoded concept.

Wearing a lapel pin featuring the flags of the U.S., Canada and Mexico, Pastor told AIM that he favors a $200-billion North American Investment Fund to pull Mexico out of poverty and a national biometric identity card for the purpose of controlling the movement of people in and out of the U.S.

So the "conspiracy" is now very much out in the open, if only the media would pay some attention to it. (source)

One problem is that the media is not interested in this topic. Perhaps they think it's a good idea, but are afraid to publicize the fact that is is actually a possible reality for fear Americans will stand up and protest. Imagine for one minute that there is ONE legal system for all three countries? What a disaster that would be.

The conference, conducted in cooperation with the American Society of International Law, an organization affiliated with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations, was held at the American University Washington College of Law. A large number of speakers came from American University. [snip]

Academic literature distributed in advance to conference participants about a common legal framework for the U.S., Canada and Mexico included proposals for a North American Court of Justice (with the authority to overrule a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court), a North American Trade Tribunal, a North American Court of Justice, and a Charter of Fundamental Human Rights for North America, also dubbed the North American Social Charter.

Do any of you want a "North American Parliament", a permanent tribunal" on trade issues, or anything even slightly similar to the European Union, European Parliament or European Court of Justice? Talking about the suggested wall between Mexico and the U.S., Stephen Zamora of the University of Houston Law School said, "What does citizenship mean anymore?" Obviously it doesn't mean much to Mr. Zamora. To me being an American citizen means everything. It is a matter of pride, it means we have a special history, a special form of government, a special form of legal system. All that would change with a North American Union.

Another speaker, Tom Farer, Dean of the Graduate School of International Studies at the University of Denver said , Tom Tancredo 'was a backward thinker' and 'could be seen "dragging his knuckles along the ground."' I believe Tom Tancredo is a brave leader in the fight against illegal aliens here in the United States. Of course with a North American Union, there would be no such thing as 'illegal'.

The article is long, detailed, and well worth the read. Go read it all here.

**This was a production of The Coalition Against Illegal Immigration (CAII). If you would like to participate, please go to the above link to learn more. Afterwards, email stiknstein-at-gmail-dot-com and let us know at what level you would like to participate.

Comments

[Debbie]

Don't worry about the trackbacks. It is TypePad's problem, I have sent them help tickets to no avail. They say they are working on it. We will see. Thanks for the cross post

Debbie

[BobF]

That might not be a bad idea, making Mexico part of the United States. All those companies that packed up and went to Mexico in order to pay slave wages but charge increased prices here in the US will not have to pay at least Minimum Wage. Once the unions get down there, the wages will go up considerably. Also, we'll be able to collect taxes on all those businesses and investments that went there too. Go to any auto parts store and you will find about 85% of the auto parts are manufactured in Mexico. And, the best reason for making Mexico a part of the US: Their oil will become out oil.

[canuckistani]

Good! Now someone else can deal with the French in Canada! Whew, we'll be off the hook.

[MOGS]

And to think, many thought the theme in the 21st century was going to balkanization, not integration in North America :)

Interesting times we live in,

ponder this much, we must...

[canuckistani]

I was joking when I made my first comment.

Canada kicked your asses once in the war of 1812, do you really want to be humiliated again? You realize we'll have the Hispanics on our side after we join forces with Mexico and form a pincer movement to squeeze the U.S. Yes, you have superior firepower but we will have the numbers. We will have the globe behind us after your bull-in-a-china-shop forays around the world this decade.

We may be connected economically, but to become one North American entity is a completely different thing. Canadians will never go for that. We will go down with a fight.

[Violence Worker]

Ah, Canucki, how we like to dream!

You may have gotten lucky in 1812 (with a lot of help from the British). We were young then and but children. Things are different today. Your armed forces, while well trained, lack numbers and sophisticated equipment. We own the air over North America. Canada might be a bit formidable, but I suspect the Mexicans are not quite up to most modern standards.

As to the rest of the world helping you, I doubt it. Thug-o and Fidel maybe, but the rest - not so much.

If it means anything, I'm not for combining the the three at all.

VW