DNC Mob Hits Alito

The DNC wrote a disgusting hit piece about Judge Alito that was "not for attribution" except for one small thing. 

First it was written July 7, 2005, implying that the DNC developed these anonymous hit pieces on every possible Supreme Court nominee prior to Roberts nomination. Second, while Prendergrast might have been the original version, DNC research director Devorah Adler was the most recent editor. For someone who was just promoted into the research director position in September, Adler stumbles right out of the gate...

The circulated the Word Document File and left in the Metadata. 

The call him Samuel "Scalito" Alito.  It's an allusion to the way mobsters  have ncknames.  The next thing down is the fact that as a prosecutor, he failed to get some convictions on some mobsters.  Hey, he was just makin' his bones!  How many prosecutors have lost to slick mob attorneys over the years?

The DNC can't win on ideas.  They have to resort to trickery and fraud and that won't get them far.

Read the whole thing at Wizbang!

VW

Comments

[rockingrama]

This may be a time when it would be prudent for Republicans to speak softly about fraud, misrepresentation and criminal activity. I'm against it no matter the political affiliation of the perp, but slinging attitude about errors does not equal an indictment or effectively take attention away from those that are in process...all Republicans, by the way. Frankly, both parties appeal less to me all the time. Since I still care about people in a real sense, I choose the democrats 51/49.

[Violence Worker]

I'm curious. Why should we speak softly? There has been 1 indictment in the Bush administration. There were almost 30 in the Clinton Whitehouse.

Voter fraud in Detroit, Seattle, Chicago and other large cities, all Democrats.

Now comes a smear job on a good and decent man by party hacks? If you care about people, maybe you should ask the DNC why they would do such a thing to a man who doesn't deserve that kind of mudslinging.

VW